Domestic Abuse
A
Tale of the Pauls:
Although you might have missed it, the government shut down last night. Senator Rand Paul, the gadfly from Kentucky,
held up a vote on the budget bill for hours.
Rand, one of the few Republicans who still thinks that ballooning deficits
are a bad thing, argued for the reinstatement of strict spending caps. He criticized his Republican colleagues, the
ones who consistently attacked and stymied Obama for spending his way out of
the Bush recession when he was trying to stimulate a failing economy, for only
caring about deficits when Democrats are in office. Paul’s criticism of his Republican colleagues
is spot on, many of them won their seats by attacking “rampant” spending and
deficits, but have now suspended their concerns about deficits because who
cares about deficits when there is no Democratic president to attack. Paul’s
principled position would be easier to admire if he showed more consistency, it’s
hard to forget that he voted for Trump’s deficit expanding tax bill. Despite Paul’s irritating performance, the
sleepy and agitated Senate finally got to vote and sometime around 2 AM this
morning passed the budget bill by a vote of 71-28. Though the outcome of the Senate vote was
never in doubt, for a while the outcome of the House vote was uncertain because
of the other Paul, Speaker Ryan, his refusal to make an unqualified commitment
to take up DACA legislation infuriates many Democrats. Unlike Senate Majority Leader McConnell who
says that he will allow DACA legislation to proceed in the Senate through a free
wielding, regular way process, Ryan continues to hedge his commitment. Though he says that no one should “doubt his real
commitment to DACA” Ryan has only committed to vote on a plan that has Trump’s
support and any plan with Trump’s support is unlikely to please Democrats and
other DACA supporters. As a result of Ryan’s reluctance to go all in on a finding
a reasonable DACA solution a good number of Democratic progressives joined
their Freedom Caucus rivals in opposing the budget bill. Nevertheless, shortly before 6 AM this morning,
enough Democrats signed on, the House joined their Senate colleagues, voting
240-186 to pass the budget bill. As soon
as Trump signs the bill the government will end its brief shutdown and open for
business.
The
Porter Problem:
It turns out that quite a few people knew about White House aide Rob
Porter’s history of wife beating. White
House Counsel Don McGahn has known for a year and Chief of Staff Kelly has
known for several months. McGahn was happy to have Porter around because
he thought that he was an “influential gatekeeper” to Trump so he chose to
believe Porter’s assertions that that abuse stuff was no bigly. Kelly, short on help, particularly once his
former right hand woman was promoted to Secretary of Homeland Security, handed Porter
even more responsibilities after learning about his past, because “revering women”
only goes so far. Both McGahn and Kelly were
easily persuaded by Porter’s assertions that the accusations against him were
blown out of proportion by his two ex-wives and neither were all that concerned
about Porter’s inability to obtain a permanent security clearance. In fact, when Kelly learned about Porter’s
history of abuse, he seemed more surprised that Porter had actually been
married twice than concerned about his past actions. Porter’s history of abuse started
closing in on him only after one of his ex-girlfriends, an unnamed
administration employee, went to the FBI to complain about him after she learned
that he was dating Communications guru Hope Hicks. Already aware of his past, the FBI followed up
with additional interviews of his ex-wives and discovered that Porter had
reached out to one of them to try to get her to deny that she had been the
victim of “violent” abuse. Although the
party line is that Kelly wasn’t fully up to speed about the extent of Porter’s
history, that’s probably just a ruse, reports are that he knew about the abuse but
was willing to overlook Porters “problems” until the pictures of one of those
ex-wives sporting a shiner went public, forcing him to withdraw his support. Porter is gone from the White House but Kelly
is still there, though he is now under the gun, with some suggesting his White
House days are numbered. Hope Hicks, who wrote the initial press releases
supporting Porter despite the inappropriateness of her involvement given her
relationship with him, is also getting some unwanted attention but no one thinks
that her career at the White House will be at all impacted by her association with
Porter, to the extent that she is still associated with Porter, because she remains
Trump’s favorite. As to Trump, the party
line at the White House is that Trump knew little if anything about Porter’s
past and that he didn’t even know that Porter and Hicks were an item. Probably
not true, but what else would we expect to hear from this White House. When asked about all of this, VP Pence, who
is now hanging out in Korea, said that he knew nothing and knows nothing about
anything. Pence remains really good at distancing
himself from anything controversial.
The
Nunes Chronicles:
Trump still hasn’t formally signed off on the Democratic rebuttal to the Nunes memo but expectations are that he will
sign off today as late as possible and probably with a few key redactions so
that no one notices or can tell what the memo reveals. In the meantime, in anticipation of Nunes’
next memo, the one that Nunes claims will prove that the State Department is as
corrupt as FBI and Justice, Jonathan Winer, a former Deputy Assistant Secretary
of State published details of his not very controversial relationship and interactions
with dossier writer Christopher Steele in today’s Washington Post. Winer writes that his relationship with the
highly respected former British agent was totally above board and that Steele routinely
provided State with useful intelligence that covered a number of subjects and was
both appreciated and valuable.
Nevertheless, it’s likely that Nunes will spin Winer’s Steele
relationship into more evidence about the evil deep state anti-Trump conspiracy. Winer and the State Department are not the
only ones under fire, Senator Warner, the senior Democrat on the Senate Intelligence
Committee is currently experiencing his own Trump and Fox assault for his
attempts to reach out to Steele last year.
Yesterday with attention focused on the Porter affair and the possibility
of a government shutdown, Trump found time to tweet “Wow! -Senator Mark Warner got caught having extensive contact
with a lobbyist for a Russian oligarch. Warner did not want a ‘paper trail’ on
a ‘private’ meeting (in London) he requested with Steele of fraudulent Dossier
fame. All tied into Crooked Hillary.” Trump’s tweet was a response to something he
had just watched on Fox News. Even the
Washington Examiner, a conservative, Trump friendly paper called Trump out for
his accusation referring to it as more of his “Crooked Hillary” shtick. In any case, Warner’s texts were not a secret, his committee already knows about his unsuccessful
efforts to contact Steele, efforts that took place early in the investigation process
well before Steele had spent time speaking with Special Counsel Mueller. Notably, Trump and Fox seemed to have
conveniently forgotten that Nunes secretly sent two of his guys to London to
track down Steele for an interview of his own.
Wouldn’t it be nice if Trump directed a little more of his time to ferreting
out abusers closer to home, like in the White House.
No comments:
Post a Comment