That Horrible Deal
Unwinding Obama: He said all along that he
would do it and so he did. Trump went
hardline, pulling the US out of “the horrible, one sided deal,” a deal made
worse because it was negotiated by and viewed as a major accomplishment of his
predecessor, Obama. His dislike for the
deal, like his dislike for the Paris Climate accords and Obamacare, has been
clear from day one so his action wasn’t really a surprise. Still, optimists had hoped that pleas from French,
UK and German leaders would have convinced Trump to temper his worst instincts
by opting for further negotiations in lieu of an abrupt pullout. Trump’s criticisms of the deal aren’t all
wrong, it was flawed in that it had a defined end date, did not address and therefore did not solve the problem of
Iran’s regional aggression and hadn’t stopped its ballistic missile program. That said, the Iranians were sticking to the
deal’s terms and according to inspectors and the US military and intelligence
had stopped advancing their nuclear program. In making his decision, Trump
resisted the recommendations of his well respected Defense Secretary Mattis who
has consistently said that staying in the deal while pressing for separate
negotiations to lengthen its term and to address Iran’s bad behavior was the
more prudent option. Surprisingly, given
his history of opposing the deal, newly appointed Secretary of State Pompeo
also argued for Trump to delay pulling out, he wanted to give negotiators in
Europe more time to see if they could get Iran to agree to additional
restrictions. He’s now had his first policy fail. Not so surprising, national security advisor Bolton
was fully on board with Trump’s decision.
Bolton, an avowed Neocon who still believes that the war in Iraq was a
good thing, is all in on regime change and he, like Trump, believes that pulling
US support from the deal makes regime change in Iran more likely and if that
means war so be it. The Saudis who view
Iran as their biggest regional rival are happy with Trump’s decision and have
promised to do their best to stabilize oil markets as necessary. The picture in Israel is a little more
complex. Prime Minister Netanyahu has
been an outspoken critic of the deal and has used his bully pulpit to speak
against it whenever possible, however, Israeli military and intelligence officials
mostly disagree, they don’t trust Iran but believe that the deal was the best way to push off Iran’s nuclear
aspirations. Hardliners in Iran feel vindicated,
they never trusted US intentions in the first place. At least for now Iran is saying that they
will stick to the deal while assessing the impact of the US pullout and the re-imposition
of “harsh” sanctions, something that is supposed to take place over the next
six months, on their economic aspirations.
They are expected to try to work with the other deal participants to
blunt the impact of US withdrawal, turning their focus to Russia and China,
something that further isolates and diminishes the US world role. As to that other nuclear player, North Korea,
parts of Trump’s speech seemed intended to warn Kim Jong Un that he better take
Trump’s denuclearization objectives seriously during the upcoming summit or
else, a message that might not work all that well with a country that already
has nukes. During his speech Trump also revealed that Pompeo was on his way
to North Korea to further pre-summit discussions. Expectations are that Pompeo will have some
traveling partners for his return trip, he’s hoping to bring home the three
captive Americans. Obama, who has
remained largely silent during Trump’s term called out Trump’s actions saying
that they erode credibility, putting the US at odds with other world partners
and powers. He emphasized that the
deal “was never intended to solve all of our problems with Iran,” and warned
that undermining it despite no clear evidence of Iranian violations could
hasten an arms race or outright regional conflict. Former CIA director Brennan was even more
direct, he said “Trump’s madness is a
danger to our national security.” John Kerry, who had been trying a little
backdoor diplomacy of his own was wistful and apoplectic at the same time
something that shouldn’t even be humanly possible.
Catastrophe Cohen: Yesterday’s
news cycle should have been completely dominated by Trump’s Iran agreement withdrawal
and it almost was but then Stormy Daniel’s lawyer Michael Avenatti tweeted out a claim
that Trump’s fixer/lawyer Michael Cohen had received $500,000 from a company
controlled by a Russian oligarch named Viktor Vekselberg and that the funds had
been deposited into an account for Essential Consultants, the company that was
also used to make the Stormy hush payment. Avenatti, also detailed other
transactions he said were suspicious, including $400,000 from drug giant
Novartis, $150,000 from the state-run
Korea Aerospace Industries, and $200,000 from AT&T. Avenotti’s assertions were validated when ATT,
who has been fighting with Trump over its acquisition of Time Warner confirmed
that it had paid Cohen's “company” for "insights" into the Trump
administration. Novartis also confirmed
that they had made $400,000 in payments to Cohen, saying that they were for “health
care policy matters” and that they really didn’t count since they were authorized
by prior management. All in all more
than $4 million flowed through the Essential Consultant accounts during the period
shortly before the 2016 election and up to January of this year. In all likelihood Cohen, who is not a
registered lobbyist, was engaging in a little influence peddling, selling his
access and connections to Trump to the highest bidders. All the payments are
questionable but the ones from Vekselberg, one of Putin’s cronies, is probably
the bigliest problem for fairly obvious reasons. Vekselberg, a Putin crony who
is now on the list of sanctioned Russians, attended Trump’s inauguration and
has already been interviewed by Special Counsel Mueller, an interview that took
place after Mueller’s guys pulled Vekselberg off of his plane during his last
visit to the US. Vekselberg’s payment was made through a US investment firm owned
by one of his relatives so it might have been technically legal but it is
certainly questionable. It’s not clear how
Avenatti obtained this information, but virtually all of the major news outlets
have now confirmed its validity so it does appear to be accurate. Suffice it to say that the pressure on Cohen
to talk is mounting by the minute and apparently he has a lot to talk about.
Election Update: Convicted criminal Don Blankenship’s hopes of
becoming the Republican candidate for West Virginia Senator went up in smoke
yesterday after he lost his primary bid to run against the incumbent Democratic
Senator Joe Manchin, instead Manchin will face off against West Virginia’s
Attorney General Morrisey. It turns out
that not enough voters were impressed with Blankenship’s strategy of calling
Mitch McConnell cocaine Mitch and attacking his father in law as a China person
and it certainly didn’t help that Trump weighed in at the end telling voters to
vote for anyone but Blankenship. At this
point, despite Trump’s overwhelming victory in the state, the relatively
popular Manchin is still the frontrunner, at least for now. In a trend that could bode well for Democrats,
their moderate candidates beat out more progressive rivals. In Ohio the former Consumer Financial Bureau
head Richard Cordray overwhelming beat the more left wing Dennis Kucinich
despite his Berniac support. Cordray
will face Republican Mike DeWine for the governorship left open by the term limit
forced departure of Ohio’s current Governor John Kasich. DeWine aligned himself with Trump’s policies
and has promised to pull Ohio out of the Medicaid expansion program something
that wouldn’t be good for Ohio’s residents but then again we have learned the
hard way that there are a lot of voters out there who vote against their own
interests so there is no telling how this election will turn out. There was one notable upset in North Carolina
where the Charlotte area incumbent Republican, Congressman Robert Pittenger, was
defeated by former Pastor Mark Harris. Pittenger’s
loss makes the district a better target
for Democrats in November since it is generally easier to beat a nonincumbent candidate. And so it goes.
No comments:
Post a Comment