About Garth Brooks
The Thunder Rolls: Yesterday, during his
sentencing hearing Trump’s one time campaign chairman Paul Manafort finally apologized
for his crimes saying “I am sorry . . . I am a different person. . . . I
know that it was my conduct that brought me here today.” He asked for
“compassion . . . if not for me, then for my family.”
Judge Amy Berman Jackson didn’t buy it, she was also somewhat suspicious about the
gout that he and his lawyers said was responsible for him speaking from a wheel
chair, saying that no one had showed her any medical evaluation that indicated
that he was all that impaired. It wasn’t
just the gout, she also didn’t buy into the short sentence that he had received
from his Virginia Judge T.S. Ellis, but said that fixing that sentence wasn’t
her job. Among other things she attacked Trump’s favorite “no collusion” mantra
by pointing out that the case in front of her didn’t address collusion, that
was something being investigated by Special Counsel Mueller and that we would
all have to wait for his conclusions. She criticized Manafort for “dissembling at
every turn” and for the “amount of fraud” he committed and said that his
behavior is “antithetical to the American values” he claimed to champion. She very pointedly said that facts matters. Despite her condemnation of Manafort, her
sentencing wasn’t as harsh as it could have been. On the first count against Manafort, she imposed
a sentence of 60 months, 30 months to run concurrent
and 30 consecutive to the 47 month sentence imposed in Virginia. On his second
count, she imposed a sentence of 13 months, to run consecutive to both count
one and the Virginia sentence. As a result Manafort’s prison time was doubled
to about 7 ½ years. Despite Judge
Jackson’s clear statement about collusion and the importance of speaking truth,
Manafort’s lead lawyer Kevin Dowling’s first words to the press and crowd
waiting outside the court room was that the judge had "conceded
that there was absolutely no evidence of any Russian collusion in this
case." He then added "So that makes two courts, two courts have ruled
no evidence of any collusion with the Russians." Those words were a nod to
Trump, part of Manafort’s continuing pitch for a pardon but the crowd outside
the court wasn’t buying any of it, a number of them jeered in response. Manhattan
District Attorney Cyrus Vance didn’t buy it either, within an hour of Manafort’s
sentencing he announced sixteen indictments against Manafort for a number of
state financial crimes including mortgage fraud, an insurance policy intended
to guarantee that Manafort stays behind bars even if he gets a Trump pardon for
his federal crimes. As to Trump
yesterday he remarked that he feels
“very badly for Paul Manafort,” going on to assert that he had
“not thought about” a pardon for him. Really?
Friends in Low Places: Michael Cohen’s is the case that keeps on giving.
Federal prosecutors are now looking into a series of “back channel” conversations
and emails, because there almost always seem to be emails, between a lawyer named Robert Costello and his “ally,” Trump’s
current lawyer/fixer Rudy Giuliani. Those
conversations which took place shortly after Cohen’s office and home were
raided by the FBI addressed the possibility of a pardon for Cohen. Although
Giuliani told Costello that Trump was unwilling to discuss pardons at that time,
after their conversation Costello emailed Cohen assuring
him that he should “Sleep well tonight, you have friends in high places.” Adding
in a postscript “Some very positive comments about you from the White House.
Rudy noted how that followed my chat with him last night.”
Costello now says that those statements were “misunderstood,” that they weren’t
dangling a pardon, they were just referencing some Garth Brooks lyrics. Though he didn’t specify his favorite country
songs, Matt Whitaker who precipitously quit the Trump Justice Department a few
weeks ago made a return appearance to Congress yesterday. He testified in front of a closed door session
of Democratic Chairman Jerry Nadler’s Judiciary Committee. Immediately after that testimony ended Nadler
reported that Whitaker contradicted the questionable testimony that he had
delivered in an earlier public hearing. Specifically Nadler said that this time
Whitaker “did not deny” that Trump reached out to him to discuss the case
against Michael Cohen. Nor did he deny
that he had been “directly involved in conversations about whether to fire one
or more US attorneys.” He also did not deny that he had been “involved in
conversations about the scope” of US Attorney Geoffrey Berman’s recusal from
the Cohen case, and whether subordinate prosecutors in his office at the
Southern District of New York “went too far” pursuing the campaign finance case
in which Cohen has implicated Trump. Nadler’s counterpart, ranking Republican
Doulas Collins pushed back insisting that Nadler was misreporting Whitaker’s
remarks, calling them just an “interpretation” and “overreach” and a Republican
staff lawyer who was also present asserted that Whitaker simply could not
remember ever conversing with Trump about Cohen’s case. It’s hardly likely that the usually very precise
Nadler misheard anything, and in any case it’s fair to assume that there will
be official transcripts of the Whitaker session. Whitaker, who in addition to having served as
the acting Attorney General during the period between Sessions and Barr, was
once a US Attorney. He may be sleazy but
he’s smart enough to have noticed that the other Trumpkins caught lying to the
FBI and/or Congress have lost their licenses to practice law or worse. If Nadler is correct, and he probably is,
Whitaker was cleaning up the record, an effort to insure that he doesn’t end up
as more Trump collateral damage. Late
Tuesday, in another indication that he is winding up his investigation, Special Counsel Mueller filed papers
indicating that though one time national security advisor Michael Flynn
continues to cooperate with law enforcement authorities and could be called
upon to testify in a case in front of the Easter District of Virginia, his
cooperation with the core of the “Russia” investigation is otherwise complete. Maybe former CIA guy Brennan had it wrong,
maybe Mueller doesn’t fear the Ides of March?
No comments:
Post a Comment