Redactive Therapy
More Alternative Reality: Trump has
booted his Homeland Secretary and is in the process of replacing much of the
rest of Homeland Security leadership with individuals who he believes will be
more willing to implement harsher policies even when those policies violate the
orders of those very “bad” and “unfair” judges. Yesterday, departing Homeland head
Nielsen announced that the Acting Deputy secretary Claire Grady, the next in
line for her position, had “resigned,” forced out so that Trump could promote
his preferred candidate to Acting Secretary.
Nevertheless when asked about the forced turnover
at Homeland Security, Trump denied that he was doing “housecleaning” and then
also denied that there were any plans to reinstate the child separation policy
that he probably does plan to reinstate.
As to that policy, he went on to assert that it was a holdover from
Obama and that he should get credit for stopping it. He was almost immediately fact checked on the
Obama reference with Shepard Smith at Fox News declaring it fake news. For the record under Obama children were separated from parents only when authorities had concerns for their
well-being or could not confirm that the adult was in fact their legal
guardian, but not as a blanket policy. In any case Trump is right about one thing,
the numbers of immigrants trying to cross
the southern border is up significantly, not yet at historical levels but still
high. Not only aren’t his policies working,
its highly likely that they are being counterproductive. It turns out that
threatening to shut the border and cutting aid intended to make countries like
Guatemala, El Salvador and Honduras more secure for vulnerable populations
doesn’t do much to halt migration. Who
knew that stopping migrant flows could be so complicated? Separately the New York Times reports that
Trump has been quietly firing the many undocumented employees that have been keeping
his resort properties running for years.
Redactions
Galore: Yesterday
Attorney General Barr testified in front of the House Appropriations Committee where
he was subjected to countless questions about the Mueller Report. He pretty much refused to answer any
questions about the substance of the report but did confirm that the Justice
Department is on schedule to release their redacted version by mid-month,
probably around the same time that Congress goes off on its Easter break
because the best time to release controversial information is when everyone is
out of town. As to the report, he
confirmed that it will be redacted to remove secret grand jury information;
material that can compromise sensitive sources and methods (spy stuff);
information that could affect ongoing investigations; and material that could
affect the privacy and reputations of peripheral third parties, of course he
didn’t define peripheral. He also said that he had no plans to ask a judge for permission
to share any of that Grand Jury testimony even though he could leaving the
general impression that transparency is not his priority and may in fact be the
enemy of the administration and Trump who appears to be growing increasingly
concerned about what the report, even the redacted one, will reveal. Barr said that before he released his now
infamous four page “summary” the letter that allowed Trump to declare that he’d
been fully exonerated, he offered to let Special Counsel Mueller read it, but
that Mueller expressed no interest. He
also denied that he’d heard anything from any of those Mueller team members who
are reported to be quite distressed about the way that he’s been handling their
work product. Curiously Barr refused to tell lawmakers whether the Department of Justice had
briefed the White House on the report.
At least one Democratic Congressman, Pennsylvania’s Matt Cartwright, managed
to ask a question about something very pertinent to most Americans, Barr’s
decision to weigh in on the side of the red state attorneys general seeking to
have the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) declared unconstitutional. Barr responded with a shrug, saying more or
less that he’s just a lawyer, he’s not in charge of health care and that if
Democrats thought that the attorneys general’s case was so weak and the lower
court judge who ruled against Obamacare had taken such an “outrageous position,”
they had nothing to worry about. Apparently, the possibility, even a small
one, that more than 20 million people could lose access to health care and that
the entire insurance market could be upended doesn’t bother Barr. While Barr was parrying with the
Appropriations Committee, Treasury Secretary Mnuchin was tangling with Chairperson
Maxine Waters’ House Financial Services Committee. He testified that Treasury lawyers had consulted
with but did not, or at least so far, have not taken direction from the White
House on the issue of releasing Trump's personal tax returns. When queried about that by NY Democratic Congresswoman
Carolyn Maloney, Mnuchin said that he didn’t “see that as interference” partially
because they had their conversation before they received the formal request for
the returns. So basically, since it was
only in expectation of getting the request, it didn’t count. In a Washington
Post Op-Ed, former Treasury Secretary and current Harvard professor Lawrence
Summers said that the law was clear, that Mnuchin shouldn’t even be involved in
the tax return conversations, that it was up to the IRS to do their job and
release the returns, and that the White House shouldn’t be consulted. He’s probably right, but then again we know
that’s not how it’s going to come down in this administration.
Other News: Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu is on his
way to an unprecedented fifth term. With
97% of the results in, both Netanyahu’s Likud party and his opponent Benny Gantz’s
Blue and White party have won 35 seats in the Knesset. Both gave victory speeches last night but it
looks like Gantz may have to take his back as Netanyahu has a better chance of forming
a ruling coalition. Netanyahu still
faces possible indictment for corruption unless of course he manages to push
through a law ruling out indictments for sitting prime ministers. Sound familiar?
No comments:
Post a Comment