Trust Me?
Open
for Business:
The government is open again, at least for now. A bipartisan group of twenty-two of the more
moderate Senators spent the weekend hunkered down in Susan Collin’s office
focused on finding a resolution to the impasse that had led to the closing in
the first place. In addition to Collins,
the group included Republicans Lindsey Graham and Jeff Flake and Democrats Joe
Manchin, Amy Klobuchar, and Chris Coons among others. They coalesced around an agreement that was
essentially identical to the funding resolution that had already been voted
down by the Senate with the one change that it expires on February 8, one week
earlier than the failed resolution’s end date.
They successfully pressed Senate Majority Leader McConnell to make a very
public commitment to bringing DACA legislation to the floor of the Senate by the
new February 8 date. Even though
McConnell’s promises typically don’t mean much, he’s failed to deliver on pledges
to Collins and Flake that he would immediately address health care and DACA in
exchange for their votes on the tax bill, the bipartisan crowd agreed to
suspend their better judgement and go with McConnell because his promise,
though not perfectly worded, was made on the Senate floor. More than enough Democrats, together with Republicans
Graham and Flake, shifted their votes from no to yes so that the revised
funding resolution passed the Senate by a vote of 81 to 18. Once passed the legislation was tossed to the
House for their approval, signed by Trump and the government was reopened. The eighteen no voters included Paul and Lee, the
two Republicans who never vote for funding resolutions, and a crowd of Democratic
Senators who have either promised never to vote for any legislation that doesn’t
include a DACA resolution, who, like Diane Feinstein, fear primary fights from
their left or who are seriously considering a run for president in 2020. That latter category includes Corey Booker, Kristin
Gillibrand, Kamala Harris, Chris Murphy, Bernie Sanders, and Elizabeth Warren. Minority
Leader Schumer took heat from his progressive branch for freeing his coalition
to vote yes, but despite their complaints his options were limited. When the other side controls the House, Senate
and presidency, there is only so much you can do and leaving the government
closed for a protracted period of time isn’t in the Democrats best interests. Of course, Trump, who had largely stayed on
the sidelines over the weekend, possibly locked in a closet so that he couldn’t
upend negotiations, took full credit for the “victory.” Going forward, the road
will be rocky to say the least. Though it’s likely that McConnell will meet his
commitment and that the Senate will take up immigration legislation, the route
to Senate passage isn’t guaranteed, the process will be impeded by anti-immigrant
Senators Perdue and Cotton. Getting
legislation on to the floor of the House will be tougher, McConnell’s
commitment doesn’t carry weight there. Absent
direction from the White House, there are no guarantees that House Speaker Ryan
will be willing to jeopardize his own position by enraging his right wing factions. As to the guy in the White House, following
the Senate vote he met with two groups of Senators, the anti-immigrant guys
Cotton and Perdue and the centrists Manchin and Jones but he hasn’t spoken with
Schumer since last week’s cheeseburger debacle and no one is sure whether he
will help or impede any legislation, he probably doesn’t know. As to Schumer, Sarah Huckabee Sanders blasted his
political prowess over the weekend by saying “I know that sometimes members like Senator Schumer need a
little help and guidance getting through big policy negotiations.” She picked the wrong guy to criticize. The
man she dissed spent the week playing the long game. He gave three of his most vulnerable Senators
valuable air time that will come in handy during their upcoming reelection
campaigns. Although McConnell never took it to a vote, before the shutdown went
into effect Missouri’s Claire McCaskill attempted to introduce legislation that
would have permitted funding of military salaries during the shutdown, to defuse
the argument that she and the Democrats don’t care about the military and
Florida’s Bill Nelson and Montana’s Jon Tester each tried to introduce
legislation delaying the shutdown altogether for a few days while issues were worked
out. Though none of these attempts got past McConnell they did produce great soundbites
for upcoming political ads. Since McCaskill’s attempt to help the military didn’t
fit his narrative, Trump had no problem ignoring it and spent much of his
weekend tweet time attacking Democrats for mistreating the military. Providing further evidence that he’s
just as slimy as Trump, Mike Pence who was off in the Middle East getting
lectured by Egypt’s President Sisi and Jordan’s King Abdullah about Jerusalem,
used a speaking opportunity in front of US Troops to also slam Democrats for
their “disregard” of the military. Pence’s
speech was particularly unseemly because traditionally leadership doesn’t pull
the military into partisan battles. Pence
also managed to defend Trump’s dalliance with and hush money payment to adult
film star Stormy Daniels, as far as he’s concerned it never happened. Apparently, Melania isn’t convinced, she’s cancelled
her plans to join Trump at the upcoming Davos Economic Forum.
People
Tidbits: The whisper campaign against Chief of Staff
John Kelly has begun. Trump has started referring
to Kelly as a nut job, the adjective previously
reserved for former FBI Director Comey. Apparently being referred to in the press as the
real decision maker in the White House may not be good for your White House longevity. It’s
early in the rumor mill cycle, but worth noting that Bannon, the last guy who
was referred to as Trump’s brain, was put into the penalty box for a similar
offense. Though he’s probably not going
anywhere right now, the new FBI Director Christopher Wray has already offered
up his resignation. Axios reports that
after he was pressured by Attorney General Sessions to clean house at the FBI,
and by clean house think get rid of former director Comey’s associates
including former Acting Director Andrew McCabe, Wray pushed back at the
interference by offering his resignation. After being told by White House
Counsel Don McGahn that losing the new FBI Director under such questionable
circumstances wasn’t worth the trouble it would cause, Sessions backed off. In
addition to his history of questionable conversations with Russians, son in law
extraordinaire, Jared Kushner also has a preference for Chinese officials. The New Yorker reports that Kushner held a series
of private meetings with representatives of the Chinese government beginning during
the post-election transition period and running into the early months of the
administration. The Chinese viewed
Kushner as their go to guy in the administration and may have taken advantage
of his secretive style and diplomatic naiveite (or idiocy, depending on who you
ask). Kushner’s propensity to avoid
official channels and hold private meetings raised alarms with Intelligence
officials who were concerned that he may have inadvertently or intentionally made
some inappropriate concessions to the Chinese out of outright ignorance or in exchange
for personal benefit in the form of help with his floundering real estate portfolio.
Though their presence isn’t necessarily tied to Kushner, the Washington Post
reports that the FBI noted that there were an inordinate number of questionable
Russian officials and hangers on at Trump’s inauguration. The attendees included the Russian “adoption”
lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya and Rinat Akhmetshin, who was also present at the
questionable Trump Tower meeting hosted by Don Jr. Curiously members of the Russian contingent showed
up at the best parties and had some of the best seats at official events, seats
typically reserved for big donors or key foreign Ambassadors.
Gerrymandering Update: Yesterday Pennsylvania’s Supreme Court ruled that
the state’s Republican drawn congressional districts were designed in such a
partisan matter that they violate the state constitution. The State Court ordered that all eighteen
districts be redrawn in the next few weeks. Republicans are likely to appeal
the ruling, but unlike the other redistricting cases that have been stayed pending
a ruling from the US Supreme Court, the Pennsylvania case relates to state law
so its less likely that the Supreme Court will get involved. Redrawing of the districts could result in an
additional four to six Pennsylvania seats going “blue.” With Democrats needing twenty-four additional
seats to take control of the House away from Republicans, the boost from
Pennsylvania could provide the 2018 tipping point.
No comments:
Post a Comment