Rudy's Stew
Giuliani Gumbo: In odd interviews with CNN and
FOX, Rudy Giuliani denied that Trump had attended the infamous Trump Tower meeting
with Natalia Veselnitskaya and her band of Russian spies and rambled something
about “another meeting that has been leaked but
hasn’t been in public yet. Going on to say “That was a meeting ― an alleged
meeting ― three days before, according to Cohen ... he says there was a meeting
with Donald Jr., with Jared Kushner, with Paul Manafort, with Gates and
possibly two others, in which they ― out of the presence of the president ―
discussed the meeting with the Russians. ... That meeting never, ever took
place. It didn’t happen. It’s a figment of his imagination.” Though what he was saying wasn’t entirely
clear, it appears that Rudy was trying to get out ahead of an as yet unreleased
assertion that various Trumpkins had attended a pre-meeting, one where they
prepared for the meeting with the Russian spies. Later Monday night he tried to walk back his curious
statements by telling a Daily Beast Reporter that he was only discussing the
second meeting because reporters from The New York Times reached out asking
about it. That reporter was Maggie Haberman who at least for now
says that she has nothing to say about that story or her sources. As to Rudy’s denial that Trump had been at
the Veselnitskaya meeting a very confused FOX commentator Melissa Francis,
asked him “Why are you saying that the president wasn’t at the meeting?” “Who
asked if he was there? No one asked if he was there.” Adding, “It’s different to say that meeting didn’t
happen ... but to say he wasn’t there implies that it happened.” While it’s
easy to dismiss Giuliani’s comments as the ramblings of a past his prime, crazy
man, Rudy may just be crazy like a fox. There’s
some thought that Rick Gates, the Manafort associate who is now cooperating
with Special Counsel Mueller, may have mentioned the second meeting to Mueller
and his team and that Giuliani and Trump are aware of what Gates knows and what
he may have told Mueller and think that leaking it out to the public in
rambling bits and pieces will blunt the force of a more complete disclosure
when and if it that disclosure happens. As
to collusion, though Trump has told us countless times that there was no
collusion, Giuliani and former NJ Governor Chris Christie seem to be acknowledging
that maybe, just maybe there was some collusion. The two are now saying that
even if there was collusion it wouldn’t matter because collusion is not a crime,
a theory that was earlier advanced by Jay Sekulow, the lawyer who used to act
as Trump’s TV spokesman before Giuliani came on board. Giuliani also said that
hacking is the crime and that Trump “didn’t hack,” something that no one
disputes because in all likelihood Trump doesn’t even know how to log on to a
computer. For the record, Giuliani isn’t wrong when he
says that collusion is not in the federal code, but most experts agree that any
Trump cooperation with the Russians could be tied to multiple
criminal violations of election law, computer hacking, false statements and wire fraud so collusion or not, Trump and Trump team canoodling with the Russians would be criminal conspiracy, a bigly problem for all concerned.
Policy Pasta: During a press conference with Italy’s fawning Prime Minister Giuseppe
Conte, whose far right coalition shares Trump’s hard line immigration views,
Trump once again said that he would close down the government if he doesn’t get
funding for his much coveted border wall.
He doubled down by slamming the broken immigration system, particularly
highlighting the horror of chain migration, odd and possibly an indication of
some problems with his in-laws given that current wife Melania’s family are amongst
its beneficiaries. To put it mildly,
Senate Leader McConnell and House Speaker Ryan are less than pleased with his
threats, they thought they he had signed off on their funding strategy last
week when they walked through their plan to fund the government through a
series of minibus spending bills, each one focused on a specific area of
government. At that time they had agreed
to defer immigration and border security funding until after the midterms. They, unlike Trump, recognize that bringing
up immigration while so many of the separated children remain separated serves
to keep his administration’s callous treatment of families in the spotlight, a problem
that is likely to push some of those more moderate suburban voters over to the
Democrats, offsetting any of the gains to be gotten by energizing Trump’s
anti-immigrant base. As to the 650
children which the government labeled as ineligible for reunification, an elegant
way of saying that government officials screwed up and don’t know where their
parents are, Judge Sabraw, the Republican appointed judge overseeing the
separation mess, has mandated that the Department of Homeland Security turn
over a list of the parents by Wednesday and is insisting that they continue to
work on locating the so called missing, mostly deported, parents. During the same news conference Trump
responded to a question about Iran by saying that he would happily meet with Iran’s
President Rouhani anytime with no conditions, another one of those foreign
policy decisions that he forgot to discuss first with his advisors. Secretary of
State Pompeo almost immediately contradicted him, or as he would say clarified
Trump’s comments, by saying that Trump would be prepared to “sit down and
have a conversation” with Rouhani only if the Iranians “demonstrate a commitment to make fundamental changes in how they treat
their own people, reduce their malign behavior, and can agree that it’s
worthwhile to enter in a nuclear agreement that actually prevents proliferation.” In other words Pompeo set conditions for
Trump’s unconditional meeting. For their
part the Iranians released a statement saying that Rouhani would be open for
talks only if the U.S. “returns to the nuclear deal” and respects “the
Iranian nation’s rights.” Also on the nuclear front, it
appears that Trump’s good friend North Korean leader Kim Jong Un is beefing up
his missile capabilities. US intelligence
officials told various news outlets that satellite
photos taken in recent weeks, indicate that work is underway on at least one
and possibly two liquid-fueled ICBMs on the outskirts of Pyongyang. Nevertheless Trump, siting the release of the
what may or may not be the remains of 50 US Korean War era US soldiers, says that all is going well with his newest
bud Kim Jong Un.
Fishy Tidbits: To no
one’s surprise, Senator Rand Paul who earlier asserted that he had problems
with Supreme Court nominee Kavanaugh now plans to vote for him. The only surprising thing about Paul’s decision
is that he made it so soon, usually the attention grabbing Paul likes to hold
out for a while longer. West Virginia Senator
Joe Manchin, one of the at risk red state Democrats up for reelection in
November, met with Kavanaugh yesterday, making him the first Democrat to sit
down with the Judge. Manchin reports
that he still hasn’t made his mind up about Kavanaugh and says that the two
spoke in great detail about health care, an issue near and dear to Manchin who,
if he decides to vote against Kavanaugh, is likely to justify his decision, not
over Roe v Wade and reproductive rights, but over concerns that Kavanaugh would
rule against the mandate to provide coverage to people with pre-existing conditions.
The conservative billionaire Koch Brothers
aren’t all that pleased with Trump’s trade and immigration policies and his “excessive
government spending” so though their donor network is still contributing
millions to Republicans they have decided to withhold funding from Representative
Kevin Cramer the Republican candidate running against North Dakota Democratic
Senator Heidi Heitkamp. They say that Cramer
doesn’t do enough to further Koch policy
views to warrant their help. They prefer
Heitkamp in large part because she voted to roll back parts of the Dodd-Frank
Act and deregulating banks is one of their priorities. Trump isn’t all that happy, yesterday he tweeted
"The globalist Koch Brothers, who have
become a total joke in real Republican circles, are against Strong Borders and
Powerful Trade, I never sought their support because I don’t need their money
or bad ideas.” The Kochs, who are among
the biggest funders of climate science deniers, are far from heroes but if their
failure to support a Republican in red state North Dakota helps keep North
Dakota’s Senate seat blue, that’s a good thing.
No comments:
Post a Comment