Inherent Contempt
Drip, Drip, Plop: Trump spent yesterday in New York City at the
United Nations annual meeting. In
addition to hobnobbing with a number of world leaders and making an unexpected very
short flyby into a session on climate change, the theme of this year’s
meetings, he answered questions and tweeted about Ukraine. He continues to deny that he asked Ukraine’s President
Zelensky to gin up an investigation into Joe and Hunter Biden in exchange for
aid but did say that he could have if he wanted to. Though the White House is still
sitting on both the transcript of Trump’s call with Zelensky and what is
probably the far more damning whistleblower complaint that brought the whole
Ukraine fiasco into the public eye, more details about the mess continue to emerge. Last night both the Washington Post and the
NY Times reported that one week before his questionable call with Zelensky took
place Trump ordered acting Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney who still serves as the
Director of the Office of Management and Budget to arrange to have $400 million
of military aid held back from Ukraine. He did that over the objections of then
national security advisor John Bolton who expressed concern over the
implications for Ukraine’s security. OMB then relayed Trump’s order to the
State Department and the Pentagon who were told that Trump had “concerns” about
corruption, as if corruption would ever concern him, and “wanted to analyze whether
the money needed to be spent.” OMB
officials were told to tell concerned members of the House and the Senate, and
there were many on both sides of the aisle, that the delays were “part of an ‘interagency
process’ but to give them no additional information” about the hold up. The
hold-up continued until pressure from Congress resulted in the money finally
being released on the night of September 11. Though most Republicans in the House and
Senate continue to support Trump because that’s what they do, Senator Mitt
Romney has broken rank, yesterday referring to Trump’s statements, he told
reporters that "Understanding
exactly what he said would be very helpful I think to determine whether the
allegations, which are quite serious, are allegations that will have consequence.”
Though Romney’s statement was far, far, far from forceful, it hit home with Trump
who responded by mocking Romney and his failed run for the presidency. For his part, the ever loyal Moscow/Mitch
McConnell called Democratic concerns
over Trump actions “regrettable” though he did confirm that the Senate
Intelligence Committee is going to get a “briefing” on the whistleblower’s
report and Lindsey Graham said that the public will be “blown away” by Trump’s “transparency”
when they find out what Trump really said during his phone call with Zelensky
whatever that means. For their part Democrats appear to have had enough. Ukraine may not be fairing well in its battle
against its land grabbing neighbor Russia but it seems to be accomplishing what
the Russian scandal never managed to do: pushing moderate “at risk” House
Democrats to move into the pro-impeachment camp and it’s looking more and more
likely that Speaker Pelosi, who has been reluctant to act without their support
is going along with them. Late yesterday
the Washington Post published an op-ed penned by seven of those vulnerable Congressional
newbies, all veterans of the military and/or defense and intelligence services. The seven say that if the allegations about Trump
and Ukraine are true, they view his actions as an “impeachable offense.” They go on to call on their colleagues
in Congress “to consider the use of all congressional authorities available to
us, including the power of ‘inherent contempt’ and impeachment hearings, to
address these new allegations, find the truth and protect our national
security.” They aren’t the only Democrats now convinced that impeachment is the
right way to go, last night two other senior Democrats, Connecticut’s Rosa DeLauro,
a close Pelosi ally, and Michigan’s Debbie Dingell jumped onto the pro-impeachment
bandwagon with DeLauro calling the Ukraine situation a matter of “grave urgency”
and a “turning point.” Speaker Pelosi spent
the night sounding out members of her caucus on impeachment and has scheduled a
4 pm all hands on deck meeting on the subject.
Stay tuned.
Climate Denier Syndrome: Turning back to the UN and climate change,
Trump walked out before teen climate change activist Grete Thunberg delivered
her impassioned and scathing speech to the UN’s General Assembly. Thunberg, who has been nominated for the Nobel
Peace prize that Trump wants so much, accused world
leaders of failing her generation saying “This is all wrong. I shouldn’t be up here. I should be back in school on the other side
of the ocean. Yet you all come to us young people for hope? How dare you!"
adding “I want you to listen
to the scientists, and I want you to unite behind the science. And then I want
you to take real action.” Though
most reacted to Thunberg’s speech by acknowledging that her criticism is spot
on and with admiration for her drive and passion, a number of right wing
climate deniers attacked her with one Fox guest calling the activist who proudly
refers to her Asperger’s syndrome diagnosis as her own superpower as a “mentally ill Swedish child,” something that
seemed to please Trump who mocked her by sarcastically tweeting “She seems like a very happy young girl
looking forward to a bright and wonderful future. So nice to see!” As to that whole Nobel Prize thing, Trump commented
on that too. He said that he deserves
one “for a lot of things” but has not received one yet because they are not
given out fairly.
Across the Pond: The British High Court ruled that Prime
Minister Boris Johnson acted unlawfully when he suspended parliament for five
weeks. Parliament is now set to resume
tomorrow. Beyond the implications for the
UK and it’s continuing Brexit problem, it is impressive that the British Courts
can react so quickly to a crisis while the US courts muddle through ours at a
snail’s pace.
No comments:
Post a Comment