Unprecedented
The
Complaint: Early yesterday the White House released a
lightly redacted version of the so-called Whistleblower Complaint. Only about nine pages long, the complaint is bigly
problem for all involved in the Ukraine mess.
The Whistleblower begins by acknowledging that he (or she, but going
forward I’ll use he) did not personally witness much of what he included in the
complaint but that it was put together based on information shared with him by
a number of other concerned witnesses to a series of events, most notably the
now infamous July 25 phone call with Ukraine President Zelensky which most if
not all of them listened to from the White House situation room. A few takeaways
from the complaint: first it details how members of the White House staff,
including several White House lawyers, realized that Trump had veered into
dangerous territory on the July call when he pressured Zelensky to cooperate in
an investigation into his rival Joe Biden in exchange for military aid so instead
of placing the transcript of the call into the usual computer/record keeping
system for such communications they stashed it into the super-secret, isolated
computer system usually used for “codeword-level” intelligence information, a computer
generally used to protect details of covert operations such as the raid that killed
Osama bin Laden rather than routine conversations with world leaders. Second, Trump dangled but held up having a meeting
with Zelensky, one that Zelensky very much needed in order to send the message
to Russia of Ukraine’s importance to the US, leaving the impression that he would
only agree to the meeting after Zelensky started investigating Biden. Trump had
earlier pulled VP Pence from the US traveling squad attending Zelensky’s May inauguration,
leaving Energy Secretary Perry as the most senior US participant, a fairly direct
message that absent cooperation on the investigation Zelensky wasn’t worthy of someone
as senior as Pence. Third, as a result
of the trouble stirred up by Trump’s lawyer/fixer Rudy Giuliani who was busy
working his contacts to dig up Biden dirt and the DNC server, two US
Ambassadors, Kurt Volker, the special representative for Ukraine negotiations
and Gordon Sondland, the Ambassador to the European Union, had to go into
damage control mode, trying to explain to members of the new Ukrainian
administration how to understand and respond to the messages that they were
receiving from Trump through Giuliani, particularly when those messages conflicted
with direction coming from more usual State Department contacts.
The
Whistleblower: The NY Times took a lot of heat yesterday after
the paper reported that the Whistleblower was a CIA Analyst who for a time had been
detailed to the White House. Critics
were concerned that the NY Times report risked identifying the Whistleblower,
subjecting him to Trump’s retribution, not an unreasonable concern given that
Trump railed against both the Whistleblower and any and all of the White House staff
who had worked with him saying that in the old days “we used to handle people
like that differently than we do now,” implying that the lying, partisan hack and
his abettors should be subjected to one of those old time electrocutions or
maybe even a firing squad. While initially
criticism of the Times appeared valid, it turns out that while the White House still
doesn’t know who the Whistleblower is, they already knew that he works for the
CIA. They know that because before the
Whistleblower submitted his formal complaint to the Intelligence Community Inspector
General, he expressed his concern about Trump’s abuse of power for his own
political interests and provided details of the July call to the CIA’s top
lawyer who, following “normal procedure,” relayed those concerns to the White
House and the Justice Department. Shortly after that, growing concerned that
his report wasn’t getting proper attention, the Whistleblower then filed his
formal complaint with the Inspector General. The Whistleblower’s lawyers are
now working with House Intelligence Chairman Schiff to obtain permission for
him to testify before Congress, presumably in a manner that will continue to protect
his identity because already two Trump friendly conspiracy theorists have put
out a bounty for him. As to those White
House lawyers, they concluded that the Whistleblower’s complaint didn’t qualify
as a valid intelligence concern since Trump isn’t a member of the intelligence
community so they forwarded it to Justice to look into as a criminal complaint. Justice determined that there was no crime
and did nothing, not all that surprising given that Attorney General Barr believes
that, as president, Trump can do no wrong and that he is also involved in the
whole mess. Some, if not all of these lawyers, probably should start hiring
lawyers of their own, they might need them very soon. At last count 225 members of Congress were on
the impeachment bandwagon and reports are that Speaker Pelosi wants to get the
impeachment done by Thanksgiving because who doesn’t want some must see TV
alongside their Turkeys?
The
DNI’s Testimony: Yesterday Acting Director of National
Intelligence Joseph Maguire, a former Vice Admiral and Navy SEAL, testified about
the Whistleblower’s Complaint first in an open televised hearing before the
House Intelligence Committee and then later in the day before a closed door
session of the Senate Committee. In some
ways the House hearing went about as expected. Chairman Schiff and the other
Democrats pressed Maguire for details about how he handled the complaint, got
him to acknowledge that the Whistleblower was an honorable fellow (or lady) and
that the complaint appeared to be legitimate.
Ranking Member Devon Nunes and the Republicans with one or two
exceptions took the opposite tack, attacking the Whistleblower as a perpetrator
of misinformation and hearsay and their Democratic colleagues as desperate
impeachment crazy lunatics who were just re-upping that old Russian “witch hunt”
to get rid of their hero, Trump. Maguire,
who had only been in his job for minutes when the Whistleblower Complaint came
to his attention, seemed like a fish out of water despite his days swimming
among the sharks. He had a difficult time
explaining why he thought that sending the complaint to the White House lawyers
and Attorney General Barr’s Justice Department, a group of people implicated by
the Whistleblower, made any sense. He
kept on saying that the whole situation was “unprecedented” given Trump’s
involvement and that he sought legal advice because he thought it was the right
thing to do given that whole executive privilege thing. Sadly he didn’t seem all that concerned that
absent the insistence of the Inspector General that the existence of the
complaint had to be reported to the House and Senate Intelligence Committees,
his action would have led to the squashing of the complaint or might have convinced
the Whistleblower to do something illegal, like go to the press, Snowden style,
in order to get his concerns the attention they warrant. Early in the administration a lot of people were
pleased that Trump appointed so many military people to senior positions,
believing that such an honorable crowd would help restrain Trump’s worse
instincts. Others weren’t so sure, it turns out that the doubters are right,
those military guys are for the most part honorable but they are also trained
to follow the chain of command and are ill equipped to cope when the person at
the top of that chain is rotten to the core.
Other
News: Trump is continuing to wage two of his
favorite wars. He has his EPA going
after California, claiming that the state’s homeless population is responsible
for polluting all the of the state’s waterways with their hypodermic needles. Improperly
disposed of needles, a problem, but it’s hard to buy into the EPA’s claim that needles
are really the concern. The EPA is also blaming
California for not doing a better job keeping the air clean; that from the administration
that want’s to allow more carbon emissions. On the immigration front, Trump has
ordered that the number of refugees allowed to
resettle in the US in the coming year be cut to 18,000, down from the administration's previous
refugee ceiling of 30,000 and an 80% cut from the 110,000 allowed
into the US during the last year of the Obama administration. So much for those huddled masses yearning to
be free.
Shana Tova to
all.
No comments:
Post a Comment