Asylum?
Impeach,
Impeach, Impeach: Though a lot of attention is now being
focused on whether or not Senate Majority Leader McConnell will allow any
witnesses during the upcoming Senate impeachment hearing and, if he does, who
they will be, action in the House isn’t over yet. Today, the usually obscure House Rules
committee will start the process of determining how much debate time the House
will spend on the articles, whether or not amendments will be allowed and voting
procedures. The Committee is also
expected to loosen up House rules as to what can be said about Trump on the House
floor. Ironically, though Trump gets to say
nasty things and frequently does, usually Congresspeople aren’t allowed to say
anything personally offensive to a president, but given that “criticism of the
president is inherent to the impeachment process” they’ll get to say more of
what they’re actually thinking than usual. That said don’t expect any of them to call out
Trump’s teeth even though the very juvenile Trump slammed Speaker Pelosi by
saying her “teeth were falling out” over the weekend. The rules process is likely to be more
animated and contentious than usual so things could take longer than planned,
but once finished the Rules Committee will pass the impeachment process to the
House floor in anticipation of an impeachment vote on Wednesday or Thursday. To that end, yesterday, more of the vulnerable
freshman Democrats, including Utah’s Ben McAdams, South Carolina’s Joe
Cunningham, Michigan’s Elissa Slotkin and Virginia’s Abigail Spanberger and Elaine
Luria put their seats in jeopardy by announcing that they will vote for
impeachment, notable because some of them eked out slim victories in very, very
Republican pro-Trump districts. And then
there is Hawaii’s Tulsi Gabbard, the disruptive presidential candidate who has
nothing to fear since she comes from a Democratic district and in any case isn’t
running for reelection. She announced that she’s still not sure how she is
going to vote, an indication that she will probably vote against impeachment. Anyone who doubted that Hillary Clinton was wrong
about Gabbard being this election’s Jill Stein should apologize now. Anyway, getting back to those vulnerable Congresspeople,
though Mike Bloomberg has pledged $10 million to help their campaigns, they will
need all the help they can get so if you are so inclined, consider going to
Actblue.com, every little bit helps.
McConnell’s
Domain: Moving back to the Senate, no Republican
Senators have shown any guts, yet. Mitt
Romney told reporters that he “wants to talk to
his colleagues about whether witnesses are necessary, saying he has a point of
view on the topic but didn’t want to talk about it yet.” The pearl clutching Susan Collins dissed Senate
leader Mitch McConnell’s plan to let Trump’s legal team dictate his
actions saying that “would not be the approach that I’ve taken,” but then
criticized Democratic leader Chuck Schumer for making his letter to McConnell about
process and witnesses public. Iowa’s vulnerable Senator Joni Ernst more or less
confirmed that she’s sticking with McConnell and Team Trump by saying that she
saw no need for any witnesses, she just wants to see the impeachment trial go
as quickly as possible. Not much was heard from the other vulnerable
Republicans, but the NY Times suggests that some more of those retiring Senators
including Kansas’ Pat Roberts might be worth watching, as they might support having
witnesses testify. That’s not to say
that any of these Republicans will do anything rash like vote for impeachment.
Rudy,
Rudy, Flynn: Rudy Giuliani continues to confound. He admitted to the New Yorker that he was
behind Ambassador to Ukraine Maria
Yovanovitch’s ouster, saying he needed her out because she was standing in the
way of his Biden and Crowdstrike dirt digging activities. In addition to the New Yorker interview,
Giuliani got more air time as his so called “Ukraine documentary” aired on the super conservative, One America News (OAN) Saturday
and Sunday. Of course, he pushed his increasingly “convoluted conspiracy”
theories about the Biden family and Ukraine. He then doubled down on Fox telling Laura
Ingraham that Yovanovitch, widely recognized as a capable diplomat, was corrupt
because she had impeded his efforts, all of which were being done on behalf of
Trump who knew what he was up to because the two chatted about it
frequently. He also implicated Secretary
of State Pompeo saying that, as instructed by Trump, he kept him in the loop
too. As to that loop, it continues to
spin, yesterday when asked, Trump acknowledged that Giuliani had spoken with
him about his most recent Kiev dirt digging trip saying that though he hadn’t
shared “too much” he’s a “very great crimefighter. He was probably the
greatest crimefighter over the last 50 years, very smart. He was the best mayor
of the city of New York, he’s a great person who loves our country, and he does
this out of love, believe me.” So
like Giuliani said a few weeks ago, he has some “insurance” in his files, and
whatever it is, it’s enough for Trump to want to keep him very close. Mike Flynn, Trump’s national security advisor
for a minute best known for leading Trump’s campaign rallies in “lock her up”
chants and for getting caught lying to the FBI will be sentenced on January 28.
“Lock him up?” Emmet Sullivan, the judge
overseeing his case rejected Flynn’s requests to compel prosecutors to turn
over additional evidence, saying his lawyers had “failed to explain” why any of
it would be relevant to the crime he has already admitted. Additionally, the exasperated Sullivan said
that Flynn’s new defense lawyers had “failed to establish a single”
violation by prosecutors of the rule requiring them to disclose to defendants
evidence that could help exonerate him adding that he had “ethical concerns”
with a legal brief that they had provided.
Who would have guessed that Flynn’s current lawyers, recommended by team
Trump were ethically compromised? It’s not a stretch to believe that assuming
the Senate hearing goes his way, a depressingly realistic assumption, Trump
will grant the lying Flynn one of those coveted golden pardons.
Etcetera: Over the weekend
the NY Times joined the list of newspapers endorsing impeachment by saying that
they agree with the House Judiciary Committee’s conclusion that Trump “has demonstrated that he will remain a threat to national
security and the Constitution if allowed to remain in office, and has acted in
a manner grossly incompatible with self-governance and the rule of law.” Yesterday, William Webster, a former head of
both the CIA and the FBI under Democratic and Republican presidents, scorched Trump
and AG Barr’s treatment of the FBI, expressing outrage at Trump for calling
them out as scum and adding that Barr’s “charges
of bias within the FBI, made without providing any evidence and in direct
dispute of the findings of the nonpartisan inspector general, risk inflicting
enduring damage on this critically important institution.” Webster isn’t the only Republican and former
official disgusted by current events. Tom Ridge, the former Pennsylvania
governor and Homeland Security Secretary told a Harrisburg audience that he is “disappointed
and troubled by the very fact that my president – and he is my president –
would ask a foreign leader of a troubled country who’s been besieged by an
enemy of the United States, to do him a political favor.” Adding that “as far as I’m concerned, it is
abuse of power.” All that said, polls
appear to be bouncing around. A Fox poll
shows support for impeachment up to 54% while a CNN poll shows it at 45%. Don’t
be surprised if Trump who expressed fury at Fox by tweeting “The @foxnewsPolls always inaccurate, are
heavily weighted toward Dems. So ridiculous - same thing happened in 2016. They
got it all wrong. Get a new pollster!” starts lavishing praise
on CNN, well for a minute. And, it’s not just Thursday’s Democratic debate that’s
up in the air, Trump is now threatening to boycott the presidential debates,
not because he isn’t super confident of his innate debate skills but because “"The problem is that the so-called Commission on
Presidential Debates is stacked with Trump Haters & Never Trumpers.” Trump is trolling us but he’s being trolled
too. Gloating over the picture of
Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov standing next to Trump during their most
recent Oval Office meeting, Russian media agreed with Congressman Eric Swalwell’s
assessment by calling Trump out as Russia’s agent and saying that when Democrats
come back into power they would welcome him to follow former Ukraine President
Yanukovych’s by seeking asylum in Russia.
No comments:
Post a Comment