Who Needs Housewives?
Reality
Programming: Yesterday was all hearings all the time. The day began in the Senate where this week’s
episode of the Lindsey Graham Show, also known as the Senate Judiciary
Committee featured Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz and
his report. Despite former FBI Director
Comey’s assertion that he’d been vindicated by the Horowitz report, the reality
is that no one, least of all Comey got off scot free. The FBI, or at least the
whole FISA (Foreign Intelligence Surveillance) warrant process, took a major
hit. Though we’ve all been told over the
past few years about how hard it is for the FBI to get authorization for a FISA
warrant, it turns out that there are plenty of flaws in the process, that once
a mistake, intentional or unintentional, is made, renewal warrants can get reissued
endlessly as everyone up and down the food chain continues to assume
information included in an initial application is true even when eventually proven
false. The prime example for this was the warrant authorizing surveillance of Carter
Page, the Trump campaign’s quirky foreign affairs “expert.” Despite recurring
errors and a reliance on what later turned out to be inaccurate information, the
authorization for his surveillance kept getting renewed. Notably, Information that Carter Page had at
times acted as an undercover informant for the CIA wasn’t initially shared with
the FBI and, when it finally was, the FBI lawyer responsible for forwarding the
information didn’t share it, instead he actually altered an email to conceal it,
worse than what I had previously called a “cut and paste” offense. It’s not clear what his motivation was for that
deception but, already gone from the FBI, he’s likely to be indicted for his
malfeasance if he hasn’t been already. Notably, Horowitz refused to call him
out by name him, but Graham did because why not add another person’s life to
the human shredder. We still don’t know how
Carter Page ended up as a CIA informant but it’s likely that before he joined
team Trump he’d been caught canoodling with Russian agents, something no one on
the Trump campaign team knew or cared about.
Anyway his informant activities did not involve spying on any of the
Trumpkins and he unlike Michael Flynn, Paul Manafort, George Papadopoulos and a
few others was never prosecuted though he did get lots of TV appearances and
has an op-ed in today’s WSJ. The FISA screw ups aside, Horowitz did not find that
any politically motivated bias affected “Crossfire Hurricane,” the name of the
FBI investigation into team Trump though you wouldn’t know that given how much
Trump and his cohorts in crime continue to scream about bias yesterday when, in
addition to rightfully criticizing the FISA process, the Committee’s
Republicans, most notably Chairman Lindsey Graham focused as much as possible
on sexting duo Lisa Page and Peter Strozk’s Trump bashing texts. In fact Graham
made them the key feature of his never ending, rambling opening remarks. Funny thing about that is that neither he nor
his Republican committee members cited any of the the texts from the pro-Trump
crowd. Wonder why?
Always
Rudy: FISA problems aside, there were some other
notable takeaways from Horowitz’s testimony.
First and foremost the independent Horowitz stands by his conclusion
that there is no evidence that political bias affected the investigation into
the Trump team. He clearly is not pleased that Attorney General Barr doubts that
conclusion. He, like the rest of us,
doesn’t see the purpose of the additional investigation by Barr’s handpicked guy
US Attorney John Durham. Moreover, he
was surprised by Durham’s statement dissing the conclusions of his
investigation because the two had discussed the rationale behind the opening of
Crossfire Hurricane. Though Durham had
told him that he didn’t necessarily agree that the information provided by Australia,
the unnamed friendly country that tipped the FBI to George Papadopoulos’ drunken
bragging about Russian plans to offer up emails to the Trump team which was the
premise for the opening of an investigation, warranted the “full” investigation
that the FBI opened, Durham agreed that there had been enough evidence to support
the opening of a “preliminary” investigation.
And as Horowitz notes in his report, “investigative
steps such as confidential human source activity that occurred here
are allowed under a preliminary investigation or full
investigation." Under questioning from
the Democratic members of the committee Horowitz revealed that he’s still
investigating the allegations that back in 2016 one or more NY FBI agents
leaked information about Anthony Weiner’s laptop and its stash of Hillary
emails to Rudy Giuliani. He’s got lots
of call records that show that conversations took place but still doesn’t have information
about what was said on those calls, but he’s still working on it! And though, the law doesn’t allow Justice
Department Inspectors General to initiate investigations into the actions of
Justice Department lawyers, other Inspectors General do not operate under
similar restrictions and it appears that some of them are already looking into
things related to Ukraine. Getting back
to Rudy, who has now settled his most recent divorce, apparently his upcoming “documentary”
on Ukraine “corruption” may have an air date. Who needs housewife programming
when you’ve got Rudy?
Prime Time: As the day turned to evening, action shifted
to the House where the Jerry Nadler led Judiciary Committee held hearings on
the articles of impeachment against Trump.
That process had little to do with actual drafting and a whole lot more
to do with pontificating and fire breathing.
Each member of the committee got to say whatever they wanted to say
about the whole impeachment thing.
Democrats who talked about the need to defend the Constitution against the
Trump crime wave were mostly somber, Republicans not so much. Representative Louis Gohmert, one of Trump’s
designated flamethrowers actually called out the Whistleblower by name during
his rant. The committee is expected to
vote on both of the articles of impeachment today before sending them to the
floor for a full House vote. It doesn’t
appear than any Republicans will crossover to the pro-impeachment side though
it’s likely that a few Democrats will vote against. That said, Speaker Pelosi is confident that
she will hold most of her caucus and that she has the votes to impeach. For his part former NYC Mayor Michael
Bloomberg, who is on Team Impeach, announced last night that he’s setting aside
$10 million to help purple/red district Democrats who get targeted by Republican
PACs and their ads for voting for impeachment.
Speaker Pelosi is all in on that, she responded by saying ““In 2018, Mayor Bloomberg was a critical ally
in helping House Democrats regain the majority. Now, the stakes are even higher
as we work to make health care more affordable by reducing the skyrocketing
cost of prescription drugs, increase wages and root out corruption. We welcome
and thank Mayor Bloomberg for his support.” The other Democrats running for president, or
at least the ones who aren’t billionaires, might find Mayor Mike’s money
problematic but the every pragmatic Pelosi gets it value and is happy to have some
of it.
Other News: During his Tuesday night rally in
Pennsylvania, Trump made a baseless claim about Lisa Page and Peter Strozk saying
that he’d heard that Strozk needed a restraining order “to keep him away from
Lisa? That’s what I heard. I don’t know if it’s true. The fake news will never
report it, but it could be true.” It’s not true, but it will provide
more fodder for any lawsuits that either of the two might want to file against
Trump, at least Kellyanne Conway’s husband George feels that way. He tweeted out all the grounds that would
justify such a lawsuit, maybe next he’ll take the case? Lev Parnas is in some more trouble this
morning for failing to disclose to Federal prosecutors that he’d received $1
million from someone in Russia in September. The payment raises “provocative”
new questions about the nature of the work Parnas and his buddy Igor Fruman
were doing and who they were doing it for and could get Parnas’ bail
revoked. It also makes it unlike that
Parnas will be available to spill his
guts to Congress anytime soon. A
skeptical person might thing that was the reason that the Barr run Justice
department disclosed this new information.
Michael Cohen, the Trump lawyer/fixer from an earlier chapter of this
saga is now asking a judge to reduce his sentence in appreciation for his
continuing efforts helping out prosecutors. On the Ukraine front, House Intelligence
Committee Chairman Adam Schiff revealed that VP Pence’s national security
assistant Jennifer Williams, who has already testified, submitted
additional classified evidence to House impeachment investigators about a September
18 phone call between Pence and Ukraine President Zelensky. Schiff is asking
Pence to declassify the information saying that there is no “legitimate basis
to keep it secret.” Surprise, surprise
Pence is not cooperating. In still other
news Israel will be holding another election, that makes three if you’re
counting, because their Democracy is even more polarized than ours. And, though he sees “good people on both
sides” and likes to use and tweet anti-Semitic tropes, Trump wants us all to
think that he’s leading the war against anti-Semitism. To that end he appears to be defining Judaism
as a nationality rather than just a religion, saying that will help him clamp
down on anti-Semitic actions on college campuses. Clamping down on college anti-Semitism,
definitely a good thing. Defining Judaism
as a nationality not so much. What’s
next? Yellow stars on lapels?
No comments:
Post a Comment